Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Investigación K

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): Enero-Junio

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Duality of Immigration Justice in the United States

DOI
https://doi.org/10.69664/kav.v18n1a552
Submitted
February 24, 2026
Published
2026-07-02

Abstract

This article analyzes the configuration of Fraenkel’s Dual State in the United States during Donald Trump's current term (2026). The objective of this piece of research is to qualitatively analyze Executive Order 13768 and Proclamation 10886, along with the lethal actions against immigrants and the violation of their fundamental human rights. Analyzing these executive orders in light of Fraenkel’s concepts allowed for an academic understanding of this phenomenon. This theoretical framework led to the determination of the substantial difference between what the author calls the Normative State, which corresponds to the constitutional legitimacy of any nation-state, and the State of Prerogative, through which a political-ideological stance can lead to the violation of fundamental rights. The latter is legally grounded in administrative law, where Trump’s administration’s current measures, justified under the idea of ​​“national security,” directly violate the international human rights of immigrants in the United States.

References

  1. Agamben, G. (2019). Estado de excepción. Adriana Hidalgo Editores.
  2. BBC News Mundo. (2026, 20 de enero). Crisis en EE.UU.: Los tiroteos que involucran a agentes del ICE en Los Ángeles y Minneapolis.
  3. Bell, K. (2025). State constitutional prohibitions against unnecessary rigor in arrest and confinement. Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy, 17(2), Artículo 3. https://doi.org/10.70658/1940-4131.1273
  4. Bobbio, N. (2024). Democracia y secreto. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  5. Brunkhorst, H. (2016). The European dual state: The double structural transformation of the public sphere and the need for repoliticization. En J. Příbáň (Ed.), Self-constitution of European society: Beyond EU politics, law and governance (pp. 239–273). Routledge.
  6. Chan, C. (2022). From legal pluralism to dual state: Evolution of the relationship between the Chinese and Hong Kong legal orders. The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 16(1), 99-135. https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2022-2004
  7. Clarke, D. C. (2022). Is China a dual state? (GW Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2022-74). SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4317126
  8. Congressional Research Service. (2025). Diverting military construction funds during a national emergency: Legal framework. Congress. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/HTML/LSB11278.web.html
  9. Fernández, F. M. (2018). Estado dual: La justicia penal en Venezuela bajo el derecho penal del enemigo. Análisis de una realidad que afecta los derechos humanos. Apuntes Filosóficos, 27(52), 65-102.
  10. Fraenkel, E. (2022). El Estado dual: Contribución a la teoría de la dictadura. Editorial Trotta.
  11. Karolewski, I. P., & Sata, R. (2025). The dual state of judiciary in Hungary and Poland. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 19, 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-025-00627-0
  12. Kato, D. (2012). Constitutionalizing anarchy: Liberalism, lynching, and the law. Journal of Hate Studies, 10(1), 143–172.
  13. Krumm, T. (2024). A dual state in Turkey? Strengths and limitations of Fraenkel’s concept for contemporary cases. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 18(1), 37–57. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12286-024-00597-9
  14. Laleff Ilieff, R. (2024). Ernst Fraenkel: El Estado dual y el concepto schmittiano de dictadura. En C. Lesgart (Ed.), Dictadura: Significados y usos de un concepto político fundamental (pp. 93-113). CLACSO.
  15. Orozco-Macías, A.-F. (2021). Estado dual en Colombia: Departamento Administrativo de Seguridad (D.A.S). Tecnologías de la información y espionaje. Ánfora, 28(51), 194-215. https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v28.n51.2021.756
  16. Roosevelt, F. D. (1942). Executive Order 9066: Authorizing the Secretary of War to Prescribe Military Areas. Federal Register, 7(38), 1407. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/executive-order-9066
  17. Roxin, C., Arzt, G., & Tiedemann, K. (1989). Introducción al derecho penal y al derecho penal procesal. Editorial Ariel.
  18. RTVC Noticias. (2026). ICE mata a tiros a una mujer en Minneapolis durante redada migratoria.
  19. Sakwa, R. (2010). The dual state in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 26(3), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.26.3.185
  20. Schotel, B. (2021). El derecho administrativo como un Estado dual. Elementos autoritarios del derecho administrativo. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 13, 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-021-00156-4
  21. Suntrup, C. J. (2020). Between prerogative power and legality – reading Ernst Fraenkel’s The Dual State as an analytical tool for present authoritarian rule. Jurisprudence, 11(3), 335-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2020.1734337
  22. Tekin, S. (2023). The dual state in Turkey. European Journal of Turkish Studies, (34). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejts.8000
  23. The Guardian. (2026). The deadliest year: A timeline of ICE deaths in 2025.
  24. Trochev, A., & Solomon, P. H. (2018). Authoritarian constitutionalism in Putin’s Russia: A pragmatic constitutional court in a dual state. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 51(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomms.2018.06.002
  25. Tushnet, M. (2022). The dual state in the United States: The case of lynching and legal lynchings. The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 16(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2022-2005
  26. Trump, D. J. (2017). Executive Order 13768: Enhancing public safety in the interior of the United States. Administration of Donald J. Trump. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-201700072/pdf/DCPD-201700072.pdf
  27. Trump, D. J. (2025). Proclamation 10886: Declaring a national emergency at the southern border of the United States. Federal Register.
  28. Trump, D. J. (2026). Continuation of the national emergencies with respect to the southern border of the United States and cartels and other transnational organizations. Federal Register, 91(9), 1665-1666.
  29. U.S. Const. amend. I. https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/
  30. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2026). ICE statistics: Detention and removal operations. https://www.ice.gov/statistics
  31. Vilajosana, J. M. (2019). El estado dual en España: Contexto y justificación de la aplicación del artículo 155 CE. Revista Catalana de Dret Públic, (Número especial), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.2436/rcdp.i0.2019.3274

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.